“If you have built castles in the air,
Your work need not be lost:
That is where they should be.
Now put the foundations under them.”
–Henry David Thoreau
Let
the Generals be tried in a court of law! After all, the Supreme Court
of Pakistan (SCP) has established criminal liability in the years-old
Asghar Khan case. And citizens of Pakistan have the legitimate right and
a national vested interest to know exactly who the real sinners are in
the decades-old political “games” that have brought this nation to the
brink of ultimate disaster. The pursuit of truth necessitates separating
fiction from reality and coming to grips with the absolute facts;
establishing the falsehood and political deception of yesteryear can
only be in the public’s best interest as well as for fairness to all
parties involved. In this difficult odyssey of political discovery, we
cannot abandon the ship now as the journey to realise genuine substance
has already commenced. In today’s world of so-called democratic
Pakistan, the political truth is too valuable to squander.
So why not hold the trial of the Generals?
Lieutenant
General (retd) Hamid Gul, the former DG ISI, in the exemplary valour
and courage of a solider, has on several TV talk shows publicly owned
the formation of IJI during his tenure. In all fairness, it must be
noted that Gul has demonstrated an unprecedented example of
moral-ethical political behaviour to have admitted his role in the
disputed issue. He should be equally credited for being willing to face a
trial and punishment, if found guilty. But the most vital part of the
General’s willingness to go on a trial are the two conditions that he
has laid down: one, the trial must be public. Two, he must not be
arrested.
Let us assume, for the sake of deliberations and to
give his civilian political adversaries the benefit of the doubt, that
the General intends to use “Machiavellian” strategies and fabricated
political charades to frighten his political opponents, most
specifically the PPP stalwarts, who are demanding his “head on a plate.”
Indeed, the PPP Federal Information Minister, as we all know, has gone
as far as to use symbolically charged derogatory images of “dragging
generals’ dead bodies through the streets.” Obviously, such public
statements, to say the least, are in utter bad taste and the narrative
is unparliamentary in its language: and yet, the top PPP leadership
seems to have solid legal evidence to put the Generals in the dock.
Okay,
let us admit that’s fair. Hence, the important questions are: why
doesn’t the PPP spill the beans on the Generals’ unconstitutional
actions? Why is Kaira rhetorically distasteful and linguistically
disgusting? Why is the PPP narrative devoid of political actions? Where
is the FIA Commission to investigate the alleged crimes by the senior
military officers named in the recent Supreme Court decision? Why did
the PPP not, in spite of being in power twice, take legal action against
the said individuals in the past?
These are extremely vital
questions that need to be carefully examined, politically analysed,
legally settled and, above all, explicitly explained to the public by
the top PPP leadership. The onus of explaining the so-called treachery
against the PPP in the past does not rest entirely on the former DG ISI,
and the former Chief of the Army Staff. It squarely rests on the top
PPP leadership as well; for it failed to take appropriate legal action
during its past tenure (post-IJI affair) and has never completely or
convincingly explained its position on the matter. It seems both rivals
in the dispute have secrets: some secrets that might publicly destroy
the PPP leadership (and some other political actors in other major
parties).
Right now, the PPP leadership is playing pure
“politics” with the SC’s recent decision. I will bet that it will not
take any meaningful legal or investigative action against the two
generals. Kaira’s rattling’s of “dragging generals’ dead bodies through
the streets” is linguistic genocide in bad taste as well as an empty
meaningless sloganistic exercise in order to improve the PPP’s fading
popularity. It also indicates Kaira’s poor judgment in believing that
such statements will appeal to public sentiment.
Here I have a
personal observation to make: General Gul’s honest willingness to face a
trial throws an open challenge to the entire community of civilian
politicians (accused of accepting funds from the ISI and PPP
leadership’s supposed involvement in anti-state activities) to take up
the issue legally and come out clean. After all, restoring personal and
moral credibility is the most important element in the conduct of
political life: what do they have to lose - unless their self-defences
are flawed, full of holes and politically difficult to explain.
My
assumption, logical analysis and understanding of Pakistan’s decade-old
status quo orientated political culture, its inherent contradictions
and corruption, its political incorrectness and structural flaws, its
intrinsic and incurable moral-ethical dilemmas, its political
leadership’s self-serving and dictatorial mindset and a host of other
socio-psychological factors lead me to conclude that General Gul’s
challenge for a public trial will never be taken up by the Pakistani
politicians.
Pakistan’s contemporary political system is
incapable of dealing with the political-moral-ethical issues that Gul’s
trial might bring to fore. There is not a single Pakistani politician
(excluding Imran Khan), who might so courageously embrace the
willingness to face a public trial for his or her alleged misconduct as
Gul has. My belief is that historically Pakistan has had a moral crisis
more than a political one.
So, let us put the two Generals, Hamid
Gul and Mirza Aslam Beg, on public trial. Let the nation hear what they
have to say. Let them publicly present evidence in support of their
contentions. Let them tell the nation their side of the story. And if
they are found guilty of alleged crimes, then let us “punish” them.
But
the entire exercise in administering moral and legal justice will be
futile, if the civilian political actors escape the responsibility of
their alleged crimes against the nation. In the IJI affair, there are
some serious allegations against politicians as well. I am afraid that
the political “sainthood” and “martyrdom” of the PPP leadership will
crumble, if everything is exposed openly and honestly. It is for this
reason that the PPP leadership has not wanted to play a seriously
focused political “game plan” of revenge and retaliation against the
army’s high command. The fact of the matter is that the PPP and other
political parties have always depended on the army’s support to come to
political power in this country.
Khan is right when he says: “Is
hammam meh sab nange hain” (Everyone here is shamelessly involved in the
charade of evil and weakness.). Is Gul politically and morally correct
when he says that the PPP leadership and all other political actors in
other major political parties have always subscribed to the US-West
four-point agenda for Pakistan’s political landscape? Let us provide
General Gul the opportunity to educate the nation in this context at his
future political trial – that the PPP Information Minster, as the
spokesperson of his party, has pledged to hold with such savage
consequences!
Irrespective of what happens in tomorrow’s Pakistan,
General Hamid Gul is deadly accurate: Unless the contemporary political
culture changes, Pakistan’s army will always have an influential role
in the political affairs of this nation. The ball is in the court of
public opinion now!
For political change in the next election,
vote for personal honesty, integrity, competence, devotion to public
causes, and demonstrated selflessness - or face the doomsday scenario in
future Pakistan!
The writer is UAE-based academic policy analyst,
conflict resolution expert and the author of several books on Pakistan
and foreign policy issues. He holds a doctorate and a masters degree
from Columbia University in New York. Email:hl_mehdi@hotmail.com