|
ISLAMABAD — Although the American media
analyzed every gesture of the foreign policy debate between Democrat
President Barack Obama and Republican contender Mitt Romney, Pakistan
media on Tuesday had yet to feature the event that took place at dawn,
Islamabad time.
Najim Rafique, director of Islamabad’s Institute of Strategic Studies
said most Pakistanis felt not much would change, regardless of who took
office.
“They are pretty sure that, whoever comes in, whether it is a
Republican administration or a Democrat administration, it’s not going
to make any difference to Pakistan," he said. "Approaches of both the
candidates ... would remain the same as far as Pakistan is concerned."
Romney, highlighting Pakistan’s nuclear warheads, the presence of
Haqqani and Taliban militants, and the dangers of becoming a failed
state, emphasized the need to work with Islamabad.
Similarly, President Obama talked of the work his administration had
done creating a partnership with Pakistan. Both comments reflected a
subtle shift from previous critical comments on Islamabad’s failure to
eliminate militants.
For Pakistan’s Senate Defense Committee Chairman Mushahid Hussain, the
important take-away message is that Pakistan will remain at the top of
the White House agenda.
"I was struck by the fact that both sides, and particularly Governor
Romney, showed a very strong commitment to having a good relationship
with Pakistan, underlining the importance of Pakistan in the context of
the Afghanistan and the nuclear weapons issue," said Hussain. "And they
both ruled out a relationship with Pakistan that [would be] termed a
divorce."
Hussain also agreed with Rafique that both candidates made one message
clear: Pakistan will have to re-evaluate how it combats extremists.
 Countries where U.S. drone attacks have occurred (2012).
For Raza Rumi, director of policy at the Jinnah Institute, because
neither candidate offered anything new — even in the way of aerial drone
strikes — hopes of the Pakistani people remain unchanged.
“Whoever wins, Pakistanis would like an equitable and more harmonious
relationship, and not the one which is based on mistrust, lots of
negative media opinion and, unfortunately, drone strikes, which are
angering the Pakistani people," he said, referencing CIA-led missile
attacks on militants in northwest Pakistan, a contentious issue between
Washington and Islamabad.
Pakistan rejects the strikes as illegal and a violation of its sovereignty.
There was little immediate response in neighboring Afghanistan on
Tuesday. Most lawmakers were out on the annual Muslim Hajj pilgrimage
and local TV stations had yet to react to the event.Obama policy about pakistan
|
Labels:
