“Everything that you have done in your past is a part of who
you are, but everything that you do today will be who you are tomorrow,”
say the sagaciously smart. General Kayani is sagacious and smart.
His one sentence in his address at the GHQ testifies to this fact.
Squaring up to the truth, the Army Chief seems willing to allow an
examination of the past mistakes and perversion of justice by the
establishment: “We are critically looking at the mistakes made in the
past and trying to set the course for a better future.”
One would want General Kayani to continue in the same vein,
reflecting a practical and actionable approach as reflected in the above
paragraph. Instead, his address was aimed at protecting the name of the
institution that he heads. But here’s the pivot: The ISI could be
heading for a double whammy, facing two adverse consequences: the
fallout from the Supreme Court judgement in Asghar Khan case and its
long history with the Taliban from the time the word Taliban became a
proper noun.
The Army Chief, as the supreme commander is perhaps pre-empting any
blame game on the ISI now that the Taliban have wormed their way to
Karachi. “While constructive criticism is well understood, conspiracy
theories based on rumours which create doubts about the very intent, are
unacceptable” warns General Kayani.
His declaration leaves little wiggle room for any serious, sober and
sincere attempt at identifying the people responsible for letting the
Islamic militants into Pakistan?’
Unless facts are ferreted, and the slipups committed by our military and
the civilian governments of the past pinpointed “a course for a better
future” as General Kayani puts it, will remain a distant dream. The
November 7 editorial in this daily clinches the crux of Gen Kayani’s
evasion of military mea culpa: “It cannot and must not be forgotten that
the internal and external instability the country faces today is
largely rooted in policies pursued by the army itself in the name of the
national interest.”
The militant groups under the generic name of Taliban today are
Pakistan’s number one security threat. How did they infiltrate our land,
who hosted them and why were they let free to turn their guns on the
country that sheltered them?
One man, a former ISI officer, has come forward with his story.
As ISI’s provincial chief (Sector Commander) in the then North West
Frontier Province (now Khyber Pakhtunkhwa) from 1996 to 1998, Col Javaid
Zahoor witnessed his superiors set up a ragtag band of ‘Arab-Afghans.’
“Soon after my takeover, I realised, that we were giving too much space
to these Islamic militants who fought the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan
(1979 to 1989). They constituted a post-jihad pool of experienced,
battle-hardened militants.
“No doubt they were our assets as rightly considered by the
‘concerned side’ of the organisation, headed by Gen Aziz. But to give
them unlimited liberty and freedom to move about was a fatal mistake,”
Col Javaid Zahoor tells me.
Since the Mujhaideen (Arab-Afghans), the Taliban and Al-Qaeda all had
their origins in the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the subsequent
Afghan Civil War, Zahoor feared they would re-group to become a force to
reckon with. They had ample experience in international terrorism and
insurgency-related violence.
“The concerned side of ISI provided chits to these people allowing
them to come and go between Pakistan and Afghanistan,” says Zahoor.
“I tried to discuss the matter with the top man of the ‘concerned
side,’ but soon realised that my pleas were falling on deaf ears,” says
Zahoor. Firm in their conviction that their grand scheme was in the
national interest, his unsolicited advice was dismissed. Zahoor was
ticked off and peremptorily told to “keep his hands off the activities
as the ‘concerned side’ was perfectly capable of monitoring their
movements.”
Snubbed into silence, Col Javed Zahoor gave up his pursuit. But
pampering the scallywags rankled him. “Knowing things so well on the
ground, I was convinced that not only will these extremists pose serious
security threats to Pakistan, they would bring a bad name to the
country. Pakistan would lose friends and allies abroad.” So Zahoor
continued with his “fragile and even dangerous checks and probes” on
these men.
It was during one of these background checks that Col Javed Zahoor
stumbled upon something so sensitive that if mishandled, it could blow
into his face and destroy his 28-year-old army career. An Arab operative
(whose identity remains undisclosed) raised Col Zahoor’s suspicions.
There was something dodgy about this character that sent red flags up in
the spymaster’s antennas. But the irony was that the boss of the
‘concerned side’ in the ISI considered the Arab to be his top man and
therefore trusted him blindly as a “valuable asset”!
As the murderous plot unravelled, Col Javed Zahoor succeeded in
enlisting the help of one of his subordinates, a major. Together the two
spies took the whole episode to its logical conclusion. “Even after the
successful unearthing of the plan and arrest of the criminals, the
so-called Mujahedeen, one of the top men in the ISI commented ‘Zahoor,
you embarrassed my person.’
Moving swiftly but silently, Zahoor got answers that he was
desperately seeking: who was the target of the attack, where was it to
take place and more urgently when was it due.
How Zahoor hacked into the Arab’s telephone conversations is another
story. We’ll leave it for another day. The retired colonel is loath to
go into details as it is classified information and too sensitive to
discuss. “Anyway I unearthed the whole gang (I have used “I” when I
should be using “We” because in any organisation, one does not work
individually, but collectively. However, I could not trust any of my
subordinates. Many had established links with this unholy lot.”
The OIC (Organisation of Islamic Cooperation) Summit, 1997 in
Islamabad was the target of the terrorist attack that the Arab and his
fellow militants had been planning for a while.
Army Chief General Jehangir Karamat was mighty pleased with Zahoor
and presented him with a Certificate of Commendation saying: In the
field of combatting terrorism, through indefatigable efforts you managed
to indent the terrorists who had posed a potent threat to the World
Leaders at the commencement of the OIC Summit Conference. Your timely
pointation and subsequent arrest of culprits by law enforcement averted
the threat of any possible assassination attempt on the Muslim Leaders.
While the ‘S’ wing in the ISI was not mentioned in the investigation
report conducted by GHQ, still the slackness on its part got mentioned .
“You (Gen Aziz), at that time one of the top men in the ISI failed to
ensure the safety of your flanks and even the safety and operational
credentials of your own organisation?”
General Shujaat, DG internal wing of the ISI was Zahoor’s immediate
boss. “His leadership is exemplary. He supported me fully in my bid to
stake out the terrorists plotting the attack on the OIC summit. The
General was one whom I took in confidence, and he responded positively
and stayed with my beliefs throughout his tenure.”
anjumniaz@rocketmail.com