“Let us take a pause and examine the two fundamental questions; one, 
are we promoting the rule of law and the constitution? Two, are we 
strengthening or weakening the institutions?”–(Excerpt from General 
Kayani’s statement)
General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani has a reputation 
for core professionalism, imperturbability and for being a man of few 
words. He has the unique honour of leading the army in the most unusual 
and perilous circumstances that have engulfed the nation, following the 
arrival of the US and Nato forces in our Western neighbourhood. The 
forces of obscurantism are threatening the internal security of our 
nation in an unprecedented manner. At this critical juncture of our 
history, the armed forces stand as the final bulwark against the rapidly
 worsening internal and external threats. The military’s leadership and 
rank and file are stretched to the maximum in matching up to the 
extraordinary challenge; making unprecedented sacrifices. It has already
 suffered over 5,000 casualties in the war on terror and there will 
inevitably be more before we ultimately prevail. The fatalities absorbed
 surpass by at least twice the combined total of the shahadats offered 
in all previous conflicts with India. Needless to say, the circumstances
 are challenging and the General has an unimpeachable loyalty to his 
command to speak out on their behalf. As he took to the rostrum before a
 gathering of officers in GHQ and made an assessment of the prevailing 
state of affairs having a bearing on the army’s operational 
functionality, his words carried much weight, sagacity and wisdom. It 
reflected an articulate and objective reading of the army’s pulse, 
sought institutional synthesis within the corridors of power, succinctly
 indicated to the stress factors injurious to the morale and bonds of 
trust among the rank and file, and pointed to a relentless institutional
 slandering campaign, waged by design or default, which sought to blame 
the entire institution for actions of a few retired senior officers 
without due consideration to the facts on ground. It was manifest that 
the General was concerned by the manner in which the army was being 
targeted by unfounded rumours and propaganda, and attempts were being 
made to tarnish the image of its leadership. “Equally important is the 
trust between the leaders and the led in the armed forces. Any effort to
 create a distinction between the two undermines the very basis of the 
concept and is not tolerated,” asserted General Kayani.When he said 
that, obviously, at the back of his mind was the slew of cases involving
 some retired senior officers, who appeared before the Supreme Court in 
rapid succession and flagged off an unsavoury anti-army campaign by 
vested quarters. Against the backdrop of deteriorating law and order 
situation in Balochistan, the calling to court of military commanders to
 account for the missing persons in the province, where a 
foreign-sponsored insurgency is in the process of forming itself into a 
full-blown phenomenon, might also have rankled the mind of the Army 
Chief. Despite the speech’s objectivity and balanced tone and tenor, it 
was amazing to note the manner in which some ‘anchorpersons’ tried to 
seize upon the communication in all negativity without digesting the 
contents and manifestly without due deliberation. Obviously, these 
individuals failed to recognise that the officers, all the way from 
bottom to the pinnacle, of the command pyramid claim the loyalty and 
following of their juniors by unflinchingly displaying an unimpeachable 
standard of personal honour and integrity. Centuries of military 
traditions have established beyond doubt that only those can lead and 
claim the trust of their subordinates, who are beyond reproach and above
 any suspicion of moral turpitude. The way in which certain elements of 
the print and electronic media highlighted a few incidents of financial 
mismanagement, involving retired army officers when serving in civil 
sector to roil the army as an institution and degrade its senior 
leadership, is only lamentable. The General is obviously, and rightly, 
anguished over this uncalled for and vested mudslinging. The insidious 
effects of such a free for all campaign to smear the army top brass are 
either not understood by those waging it or certain vested quarters are 
using the unrestrained liberty of media in Pakistan to ‘tear up the pea 
patch’ in line with their subversive agenda. Over the years, the 
Pakistani army, indeed, has consolidated its position as a sterling 
institution earning the trust and confidence of people and turning into a
 true asset for the nation. It has delivered, time and again whenever 
called upon to rally and reach out, irrespective of the staggering odds 
needed to be overcome in order to prevail. In the current context, the 
challenges have, perhaps, never been greater. Fata has turned into a 
terror hub, projecting its searing fingers into the hinterland and 
combined with the responsibility for keeping vigil on the eastern and 
western borders, particularly the latter where renegade terrorists of 
Fazlullah’s ilk as well as the trigger-happy US and Isaf troops, have to
 be kept at bay; the task is truly Herculean! Unflinching loyalty and 
solidarity, nevertheless, forms the bedrock of the army’s ethos. This 
unshakable bond of trust results in the existence of values such as 
discipline, loyalty and respect between officers and men that lend 
strength to the institution and is a true force multiplier. When a 
trumped up concerted drive, seeking to soil the integrity of the serving
 senior commanders of the army, spuriously based upon yet to be proved 
charges of financial mismanagement against a few retired officers while 
serving in civilian institutions under unexplained circumstances, 
becomes rampant, something is gravely wrong. In the army’s ethos, 
personal integrity and a sterling character provide the moral authority 
for command and in the flush of asserting authority, all pillars of 
state should take care not to unnecessarily dent the vital bonds that 
have sustained it, as a cohesive, reliable and effective institution at 
service of the nation.
The writer is a freelance columnist