“Let us take a pause and examine the two fundamental questions; one,
are we promoting the rule of law and the constitution? Two, are we
strengthening or weakening the institutions?”–(Excerpt from General
Kayani’s statement)
General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani has a reputation
for core professionalism, imperturbability and for being a man of few
words. He has the unique honour of leading the army in the most unusual
and perilous circumstances that have engulfed the nation, following the
arrival of the US and Nato forces in our Western neighbourhood. The
forces of obscurantism are threatening the internal security of our
nation in an unprecedented manner. At this critical juncture of our
history, the armed forces stand as the final bulwark against the rapidly
worsening internal and external threats. The military’s leadership and
rank and file are stretched to the maximum in matching up to the
extraordinary challenge; making unprecedented sacrifices. It has already
suffered over 5,000 casualties in the war on terror and there will
inevitably be more before we ultimately prevail. The fatalities absorbed
surpass by at least twice the combined total of the shahadats offered
in all previous conflicts with India. Needless to say, the circumstances
are challenging and the General has an unimpeachable loyalty to his
command to speak out on their behalf. As he took to the rostrum before a
gathering of officers in GHQ and made an assessment of the prevailing
state of affairs having a bearing on the army’s operational
functionality, his words carried much weight, sagacity and wisdom. It
reflected an articulate and objective reading of the army’s pulse,
sought institutional synthesis within the corridors of power, succinctly
indicated to the stress factors injurious to the morale and bonds of
trust among the rank and file, and pointed to a relentless institutional
slandering campaign, waged by design or default, which sought to blame
the entire institution for actions of a few retired senior officers
without due consideration to the facts on ground. It was manifest that
the General was concerned by the manner in which the army was being
targeted by unfounded rumours and propaganda, and attempts were being
made to tarnish the image of its leadership. “Equally important is the
trust between the leaders and the led in the armed forces. Any effort to
create a distinction between the two undermines the very basis of the
concept and is not tolerated,” asserted General Kayani.When he said
that, obviously, at the back of his mind was the slew of cases involving
some retired senior officers, who appeared before the Supreme Court in
rapid succession and flagged off an unsavoury anti-army campaign by
vested quarters. Against the backdrop of deteriorating law and order
situation in Balochistan, the calling to court of military commanders to
account for the missing persons in the province, where a
foreign-sponsored insurgency is in the process of forming itself into a
full-blown phenomenon, might also have rankled the mind of the Army
Chief. Despite the speech’s objectivity and balanced tone and tenor, it
was amazing to note the manner in which some ‘anchorpersons’ tried to
seize upon the communication in all negativity without digesting the
contents and manifestly without due deliberation. Obviously, these
individuals failed to recognise that the officers, all the way from
bottom to the pinnacle, of the command pyramid claim the loyalty and
following of their juniors by unflinchingly displaying an unimpeachable
standard of personal honour and integrity. Centuries of military
traditions have established beyond doubt that only those can lead and
claim the trust of their subordinates, who are beyond reproach and above
any suspicion of moral turpitude. The way in which certain elements of
the print and electronic media highlighted a few incidents of financial
mismanagement, involving retired army officers when serving in civil
sector to roil the army as an institution and degrade its senior
leadership, is only lamentable. The General is obviously, and rightly,
anguished over this uncalled for and vested mudslinging. The insidious
effects of such a free for all campaign to smear the army top brass are
either not understood by those waging it or certain vested quarters are
using the unrestrained liberty of media in Pakistan to ‘tear up the pea
patch’ in line with their subversive agenda. Over the years, the
Pakistani army, indeed, has consolidated its position as a sterling
institution earning the trust and confidence of people and turning into a
true asset for the nation. It has delivered, time and again whenever
called upon to rally and reach out, irrespective of the staggering odds
needed to be overcome in order to prevail. In the current context, the
challenges have, perhaps, never been greater. Fata has turned into a
terror hub, projecting its searing fingers into the hinterland and
combined with the responsibility for keeping vigil on the eastern and
western borders, particularly the latter where renegade terrorists of
Fazlullah’s ilk as well as the trigger-happy US and Isaf troops, have to
be kept at bay; the task is truly Herculean! Unflinching loyalty and
solidarity, nevertheless, forms the bedrock of the army’s ethos. This
unshakable bond of trust results in the existence of values such as
discipline, loyalty and respect between officers and men that lend
strength to the institution and is a true force multiplier. When a
trumped up concerted drive, seeking to soil the integrity of the serving
senior commanders of the army, spuriously based upon yet to be proved
charges of financial mismanagement against a few retired officers while
serving in civilian institutions under unexplained circumstances,
becomes rampant, something is gravely wrong. In the army’s ethos,
personal integrity and a sterling character provide the moral authority
for command and in the flush of asserting authority, all pillars of
state should take care not to unnecessarily dent the vital bonds that
have sustained it, as a cohesive, reliable and effective institution at
service of the nation.
The writer is a freelance columnist