General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani’s November 5 address to a
gathering of officers in the GHQ, in which he raised issues that were
having an impact on the professional efficiency and morale of the
Pakistan Army, was a sombre and realistic assessment of the military’s
pulse.
The message carried in the address went much beyond the assembled
audience and sought to remind the nation of the vitiating environment
that were beginning to take shape, causing concern and causing unease
within the army’s rank and file.
The Army Chief is responsible to
his command to ensure that its institutional concerns, beyond the realm
of his own authority, are communicated to the authorities concerned;
irrespective of ruffled feathers or cross-grained disposition towards
the obtaining flow of events and opinions. By no means, it is a sanguine
undertaking; it can carry political and professional costs, yet a
commander is duty bound to respond, however unsavoury the ensuing
backlash.
This is primarily the reason as to why, in military
service, the attribute of moral courage - the courage to unflinchingly
articulate honest opinion - rises to prominence, as one advances in
rank, seniority and the expanse of command entrusted to his care. When
he sent a message through his GHQ address, this is exactly what the COAS
was doing in utter sincerity and loyalty to the army he has the honour
to command.
Avoiding being pugnacious, the communication was a
pragmatic articulation of the prevailing state of affairs that retained
the balance of treading the middle plank. There was nothing threatening,
accusatory or offensive about it and it did not seek any
confrontational high ground; nor did it militate against any other
national institution.
Despite that fine balance, the manner in
which it was received by a section of the media or rather a few media
persons, it could only be termed as impetuous and self-righteous.
Perhaps, a much misjudged cue had been taken from the contents in the
address of the Chief Justice whose proceedings appeared in the press
alongside the reporting for COAS address.
The Chief Justice’s
deliberations, made during his address to a delegation of participants
from the National Management Course at the premises of Supreme Court
building, again reflected a well articulated thought process that
propounded the supremacy of the constitution, overarching above all the
national pillars of power. One could also not take umbrage at his
thoughts on the character and nature of national security in the
present-day scenario. “Gone are the days when stability and security was
defined in terms of numbers of missiles and tanks as a manifestation of
hard power available at the disposal of state,” the CJ had said.
With
the dimension of internal security having forced a large segment of
Pakistani army to get deployed on counter-terrorism/counter-insurgency
responsibilities in Fata and Balochistan, one could not agree more with
him that it were not missiles or tanks that could retrieve us from the
morass of the current mess. In fact, if one was to extend the logic of
his thoughts, it is the officers and ranks of the Pakistan Army and its
national commitment to carry the day for Pakistan that stand between
peril and the nation.
This brings us to the crux of the issues
raised by General Kayani, which led to an unbridled assault on the army
as an institution seeking to dent its sterling and shining image based
upon allegations of misconduct by some senior officers long since
retired. It was incomprehensible as to why the army as an institution be
bashed for personal and individual doings of a few individuals, who
were currently irrelevant to the system.
Not too long ago the
media had also carried images of senior serving officers appearing
before the court on the issue of the missing persons in Balochistan. The
message that emerged was, perhaps, that the officers and personnel of
the Frontier Constabulary (FC) were involved in this lamentable
phenomenon. A fact that got clouded in the process was that the FC was
not deployed in Balochistan by choice and had rather been requested for
by the provincial political setup in ‘aid of civil power’. The question
if these investigations were any conclusive leading to definite answers
and pointing to any culprits, goes a-begging.
Also, the Manual of
Pakistan Military Law (MPML) duly approved and acknowledged by the
constitution provides a terra firma (meaning solid earth) for addressing
such maladies within the military domain. The military tradition and
law dictates that all offences committed in uniform are tried under the
acts of MPML and not under the glare of media flashlights. This is by no
means peculiar to Pakistan, but a universal practice.
If the Army
Chief was anguished, there were solid reasons for his concerns. As if
on a cue, a plethora of cases belonging to the yore had suddenly and
collectively emerged in the Supreme Court as well as the NAB. The sudden
and negative focus, accompanied by a media tirade based on pure
rhetoric, obliterated the line separating the accused from the culprit.
It also, by default or design, sought to create a wedge between the
command echelons of the army by eroding the bonds of trust between the
leaders and the led.
The power to command flows from the
character and integrity of seniors at all levels and if these very
attributes are tarnished, then the bond of comradeship and respect begin
to strain and chafe. Those acquainted with the army culture would vouch
that it harbours no soft corner for the morally and financially
delinquent, who are cast out without making a spectacle, albeit under
acts of military law.
Pakistan’s armed forces stand out as an
incomparable national asset, which enjoys tremendous respect by the
people. This appreciation and admiration is hard-earned and well
deserved. Their unswerving loyalty, devotion to serve and unflinching
readiness for sacrifice set them apart in a class of their own. Their
ability to form the pivot for the nation to rally around has made them a
target for the forces, who, in this time of manifest weakness, want to
irreparably damage Pakistan. Their internecine clash with equally vital
national institutions can only be wished by people, who are not our
friends.
Harmony and synthesis of institutions is the bedrock of
national security; not tanks and guns as the honourable Chief Justice
has rightly mentioned in his address.
The writer is a freelance columnist.
Army, was a sombre and realistic assessment of the military’s
pulse. The message carried in the address went much beyond the assembled
audience and sought to remind the nation of the vitiating environment
that were beginning to take shape, causing concern and causing unease
within the army’s rank and file.
The Army Chief is responsible to
his command to ensure that its institutional concerns, beyond the realm
of his own authority, are communicated to the authorities concerned;
irrespective of ruffled feathers or cross-grained disposition towards
the obtaining flow of events and opinions. By no means, it is a sanguine
undertaking; it can carry political and professional costs, yet a
commander is duty bound to respond, however unsavoury the ensuing
backlash.
This is primarily the reason as to why, in military
service, the attribute of moral courage - the courage to unflinchingly
articulate honest opinion - rises to prominence, as one advances in
rank, seniority and the expanse of command entrusted to his care. When
he sent a message through his GHQ address, this is exactly what the COAS
was doing in utter sincerity and loyalty to the army he has the honour
to command.
Avoiding being pugnacious, the communication was a
pragmatic articulation of the prevailing state of affairs that retained
the balance of treading the middle plank. There was nothing threatening,
accusatory or offensive about it and it did not seek any
confrontational high ground; nor did it militate against any other
national institution.
Despite that fine balance, the manner in
which it was received by a section of the media or rather a few media
persons, it could only be termed as impetuous and self-righteous.
Perhaps, a much misjudged cue had been taken from the contents in the
address of the Chief Justice whose proceedings appeared in the press
alongside the reporting for COAS address.
The Chief Justice’s
deliberations, made during his address to a delegation of participants
from the National Management Course at the premises of Supreme Court
building, again reflected a well articulated thought process that
propounded the supremacy of the constitution, overarching above all the
national pillars of power. One could also not take umbrage at his
thoughts on the character and nature of national security in the
present-day scenario. “Gone are the days when stability and security was
defined in terms of numbers of missiles and tanks as a manifestation of
hard power available at the disposal of state,” the CJ had said.
With
the dimension of internal security having forced a large segment of
Pakistani army to get deployed on counter-terrorism/counter-insurgency
responsibilities in Fata and Balochistan, one could not agree more with
him that it were not missiles or tanks that could retrieve us from the
morass of the current mess. In fact, if one was to extend the logic of
his thoughts, it is the officers and ranks of the Pakistan Army and its
national commitment to carry the day for Pakistan that stand between
peril and the nation.
This brings us to the crux of the issues
raised by General Kayani, which led to an unbridled assault on the army
as an institution seeking to dent its sterling and shining image based
upon allegations of misconduct by some senior officers long since
retired. It was incomprehensible as to why the army as an institution be
bashed for personal and individual doings of a few individuals, who
were currently irrelevant to the system.
Not too long ago the
media had also carried images of senior serving officers appearing
before the court on the issue of the missing persons in Balochistan. The
message that emerged was, perhaps, that the officers and personnel of
the Frontier Constabulary (FC) were involved in this lamentable
phenomenon. A fact that got clouded in the process was that the FC was
not deployed in Balochistan by choice and had rather been requested for
by the provincial political setup in ‘aid of civil power’. The question
if these investigations were any conclusive leading to definite answers
and pointing to any culprits, goes a-begging.
Also, the Manual of
Pakistan Military Law (MPML) duly approved and acknowledged by the
constitution provides a terra firma (meaning solid earth) for addressing
such maladies within the military domain. The military tradition and
law dictates that all offences committed in uniform are tried under the
acts of MPML and not under the glare of media flashlights. This is by no
means peculiar to Pakistan, but a universal practice.
If the Army
Chief was anguished, there were solid reasons for his concerns. As if
on a cue, a plethora of cases belonging to the yore had suddenly and
collectively emerged in the Supreme Court as well as the NAB. The sudden
and negative focus, accompanied by a media tirade based on pure
rhetoric, obliterated the line separating the accused from the culprit.
It also, by default or design, sought to create a wedge between the
command echelons of the army by eroding the bonds of trust between the
leaders and the led.
The power to command flows from the
character and integrity of seniors at all levels and if these very
attributes are tarnished, then the bond of comradeship and respect begin
to strain and chafe. Those acquainted with the army culture would vouch
that it harbours no soft corner for the morally and financially
delinquent, who are cast out without making a spectacle, albeit under
acts of military law.
Pakistan’s armed forces stand out as an
incomparable national asset, which enjoys tremendous respect by the
people. This appreciation and admiration is hard-earned and well
deserved. Their unswerving loyalty, devotion to serve and unflinching
readiness for sacrifice set them apart in a class of their own. Their
ability to form the pivot for the nation to rally around has made them a
target for the forces, who, in this time of manifest weakness, want to
irreparably damage Pakistan. Their internecine clash with equally vital
national institutions can only be wished by people, who are not our
friends.
Harmony and synthesis of institutions is the bedrock of
national security; not tanks and guns as the honourable Chief Justice
has rightly mentioned in his address.
The writer is a freelance columnist.