Part - I
In
September 2012, the International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution
Clinic (Stanford Law School) and Global Justice Clinic (NYU School of
Law) in collaboration with the Foundation of Fundamental Rights in
Pakistan brought out a report “Living under drones: death, injury and
trauma to civilians from US drone practices in Pakistan.” It took the
dedicated team nine months of research, 130 interviews with victims,
witnesses and experts and review of thousands of pages of documentations
and media reporting.
The team was led by Professor James
Cavallaro and Clinical Lecturer Stephan Sonnenberg of Stanford Law
School. It is the most comprehensive document of 184 pages, covering all
aspects of drone warfare in Pakistan and most importantly its legal
aspect. An effort is made in this article to highlight some of the
findings of the Report.
Much of the public debate about
drone strikes in Pakistan, notes the Report, has focused narrowly on
whether strikes kill militants or civilians. The Report, however, aims
to draw attention to a critical gap in understanding, specifically about
life under drones and the socio-economic impacts of drone strikes on
civilians in North Waziristan.
Available evidence suggests
that these impacts are significant, and challenges the prevailing US
government and media narrative that portrays drones as pinpoint
precision weapons with limited collateral impact.
When the
same target is hit more than once, it is referred to as ‘double tap’.
Chris Woods of The Bureau of Investigative Journalism (TBIJ)
independently confirmed 12 out of 18 such attacks. The secondary strikes
hamper rescue work, humanitarian and medical assistance by civilians
and professional workers. People no longer rush to the scene to help for
at least half an hour. Those who do the daring, go with the knowledge
that they may be killed.
“The dissuasive effect that the
‘double tap’ pattern of strikes has on first responders, raises crucial
moral and legal concerns. Not only does the practice put into question
the extent to which secondary strikes comply with international
humanitarian laws’ basic rules of distinction, proportionality, and
precautions, but it also potentially violates specific legal protections
for medical and humanitarian personnel, and for the wounded. As
international law experts have noted, intentional strikes on first
responders may constitute war crimes,” notes the Report.
Naturally
these attacks also cause damage to property and pose economic hardship.
The survivors experience severe financial hardship as a result of
strike damage to their homes, loss of a primary breadwinner, or medical
costs incurred in caring for drone strike survivors.
In
many cases they live on the charity of the village people, which may or
may not be regularly available. In many cases young school or college
going students are pulled out and discontinue education to earn a living
for their families through hard physical labour. The rate of poverty is
already quite high in Fata. Added to this are medical bills that
include surgeries, medicine and hospital stays. One such bolt from the
blue reduces a family to poverty or sometimes even below the poverty
level.
“US authorities have not made any coordinated
effort to provide compensation to strike victims in Pakistan. The
Pakistani authorities have offered limited compensation in some
instances, but these offers, rejected by many Waziris on principle, fail
to address adequately the damage and loss of income the victims have
sustained,” notes the Report.
Drones have given rise to a
number of mental health problems. The most pervasive is the constant
fear in which the entire population lives. A former New York Times
journalist, David Rohde, who was kidnapped by the Taliban from
Afghanistan in 2008 and kept for months in Fata from where he escaped,
reported, “.....the buzz of a distant propeller is a constant reminder
of imminent death.” Describing the experience of living under drones as
‘hell on earth’, Rohde explained that even in the areas where strikes
were less frequent, the people living there still feared for their
lives.
In the words of one interviewee for the Report:
“God knows whether they’ll strike us again or not. But they’re always
surveying us, they’re always over us, and you never know when they’re
going to strike and attack.”
“Drones are always on my
mind. It makes it difficult to sleep. They are like a mosquito. Even
when you don’t see them, you can hear them, you know they are there,”
Mohammad Kausar (anonymised name), father of three. People often
complain that they wake up in the middle of the night screaming because
they are hallucinating about drones.
Based on interviews
with local psychotherapists, the Report notes, “People are proud and it
is difficult for them to express their emotions.....” Reluctant to admit
that they are mentally or emotionally distressed, the patients instead
“express their emotional ill health through their body symptoms,”
resulting in “hysterical reactions,” or “physical symptoms without a
real [organic] basis, such as aches, and pains, vomiting, etc.”
It
leads to anticipatory anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD). Many people have been severely affected to the point of
completely losing sanity because of which they are permanently locked up
in their homes.
The impact of drone attacks on children
is most worrying. Most have experienced a loss in comprehension and a
drop in scoring in different subjects. Nobody can concentrate in class
if drones are hovering above or are expected to make sudden appearances.
Many children have stopped going to the school for fear of being killed
Noor
Behram, a Waziri journalist who investigates and photographs drone
strike sites, noted the fear in children: “If you bang a door, they’ll
scream and drop (to the floor) like something bad is going to happen.”
A
Pakistani mental health professional shared his worries about the
long-term ramifications of such psychological trauma on children: “The
biggest concern I have is that when these children grow up, the kinds of
images they will have with them, it is going to have a lot of
consequences...... People who have experienced such things, they don’t
trust people; they have anger, desire for revenge.... When these young
boys and girls grow up with these impressions, it causes permanent
scarring and damage.”
To be concluded
The writer is a former federal secretary. Email: raufkkhattak@gmail.com