Theodore
Westhusing was a colonel in the United States army. A professor at West
Point, he was armed with an Emory University doctorate in philosophy.
His 352-page PhD dissertation discussed the ethics of war. It also
focused on examples of military honour. The opening pages read, ‘Born to
be a warrior, I desire these answers not just for philosophical
reasons, but for self-knowledge’.
A devout Catholic,
Westhusing was a devoted husband and a doting father of three young
children. One other trait that he possessed, an asset for humans’
military and non-military alike, was a profound spirit that sought to
differentiate right from wrong. He was given a guaranteed lifetime
teaching position at West Point. However, in the autumn of 2004
Westhusing, beguiled by Washington’s war propaganda machine, chose to
volunteer for the Iraq war. His premise, that serving in ‘Operation
Iraqi freedom’ would help him teach his military students better.
At
the war zone in Iraq, Westhusing worked as head of counterterrorism and
special operations under General Petraeus. He also oversaw the training
of the Iraqi security forces. It only took a few months for Westhusing
to conclude that the war perpetrated on Iraq was a farce to enrich
private contractors that has become the face of Washington’s
war-machine. On June 5, 2005, his mother’s birthday and a month before
going back home, Colonel Westhusing ended his life with a self-inflicted
gunshot to the head. His body was found in a trailer at the Camp Dublin
military base near Baghdad airport. At that time, he was the
highest-ranking officer to die in Iraq.
The suicide would
have been just another statistic in an unjust war, had not a four page
suicide note, an epitaph to Washington’s military forays, been found
near the body. The note addressed to Gen Petraeus read: ‘I cannot
support a mission that leads to corruption, human right abuses and
liars. I am sullied – no more. I didn’t volunteer to support corrupt,
money-grubbing contractors, nor work for commanders only interested in
themselves. I came to serve honourably and feel dishonoured. All my love
to my family, my wife and my precious children. I love you and trust
you only; death before being dishonoured any more. Why serve when you
cannot accomplish the mission, when you no longer believe in the cause?
No more. Re-evaluate yourselves, commanders. You are not what you think
you are and I know it’.
Westhusing volunteered, believing
he was helping free a country in bondage and keeping his own safe from
the weapons of mass destruction the world was falsely led to believe
Iraq possessed. ‘War is the hardest place to make moral judgements’,
wrote Westhusing in the Journal of Military Ethics. The truth that
dawned on him in Iraq was that he was fighting, as were other fellow
young men and women, to perpetuate a lie. When Westhusing’s body was
flown back to Delaware’s Dover Air Force Base, at hand were family and
friends to receive the star and stripes draped coffin. A close friend
asked Michelle, Westhusing’s wife, what had happened. Her one word
answer was ‘Iraq’.
General David Petraeus was a 1974
honour graduate from the US Military Academy. He was an award winner and
top graduate (1983) of the US Army Command and General Staff College.
In 1985 he got his MPA degree and in 1987 a PhD in International
Relations from Princeton University. Petraeus’s 343-page PhD
dissertation was captioned ‘The American Military and Lessons from
Vietnam – A Study of American Influence and the Use of Force in the
Post-Vietnam Era’.
A portion read about the ‘impact of
America’s longest (Vietnam) war and its fallout’. Not a single word was
devoted to the Vietnamese civilians who had borne the agonising brunt of
that brutal war. Not a single word mentioned the sufferings of those
who saw their loved ones blown to pieces or the very skin and flesh
peeling away by incendiary bombs. What Petraeus found was that ‘the
psychic scars of the war may be deepest among the army and marine corps
leadership’.
Ironically, it was an extramarital affair and
not the committed purge that brought about the downfall of the surge
‘hero’ and engineer of the counter-insurgency (COIN) strategy. In his
terse resignation letter Petraeus wrote, ‘I showed extremely poor
judgement by engaging in an extramarital affair. Such behaviour is
unacceptable, both as a husband and as the leader of an organisation
such as ours’.
His affair with Paula Broadwell would not
have merited a single word here, had it not been about someone who
oversaw the death of millions of (non-combatant) men, women and children
in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. It is the ignominious end of a
commander who frolicked in Afghanistan, whilst espousing his troops to
lay down their lives for an unjust and convoluted cause. For many in the
US it is an indiscretion on the part of a much storied general, for
those who bore his brunt in this part of the world; it is only a journey
from extrajudicial to extramarital.
Paula Broadwell was
the star of her high school class, homecoming queen and a fitness
champion at West Point. She graduated from Harvard and was yet again a
PhD student at the Department of War Studies, King’s College London. She
also co-wrote Petraeus’s biography titled, ‘All In: The Education of
General David Petraeus’. She had more access to Petraeus than the likes
of Colonel Westhusing or even more senior commanders. As she ran
six-minute miles with Petraeus, and more, in war ravaged Afghanistan,
civilians in Afghanistan and Pakistan kept on losing their lives.
The
affair gets murkier as reports allege that the present US military
commander in Afghanistan, General John Allen, is under investigation for
‘inappropriate’ emails to Jill Kelly, a Florida socialite, who brought
about the Petraeus downfall. Kelly has hired attorney Abbe Lowell and
crisis manager Judy Smith, who represented Monica Lewinsky during the
Clinton era. A Pentagon official said that the FBI was investigating a
trove of 30,000 (!) pages of mail with hundreds between Allen and
Kelley. Despite this soap-opera of salacious Casanovas and jilted
lovers, Pakistan is held responsible for all that went wrong in
Afghanistan.
A photo captioned ‘Four more years’ showed an
eyes closed and smiling re-elected President Obama embracing his wife.
It shattered the world record for the most popular tweet ever. Hours
after he won the second term, President Obama broke into tears while
addressing supporters at his Chicago campaign headquarters. He termed
the gathering as ‘the source of my hope, my strength and my
inspiration’. Those who voted him to victory would see the moment as
tender and soulful, the words those of an inspirational leader.
Conversely many here only saw the dichotomy.
Countless
images of the dead and crippled – men, women and children alike, the
source of hope, strength and inspiration for a multitude in this part of
the world, is maybe something too mundane to bring about the promised
change, set any sort of viewership record or make the tear-glands work.
This holds equally true for our very own, those who look forward to yet
‘five more years’ of callous indifference.
The writer is a freelance contributor. Email: miradnanaziz@gmail.com