China and the United
States are about to choose new leaders via very different methods. But
is a candidate voted for by millions a more legitimate choice than one
anointed by a select few, asks Martin Jacques.
This week will witness an extraordinary juxtaposition of
events. On Tuesday the next American president will be elected. Two days
later, the 18th congress of the Chinese Communist Party will select the
new Chinese president and prime minister.
The contrast could hardly be greater.
Americans in their tens of millions will turn out to vote. In
China the process of selection will take place behind closed doors and
involve only a relative handful of people.
You are probably thinking, "Ah, America at its best, China at
its worst - the absence of democracy. China's Achilles heel is its
governance. This will be China's downfall."
I want to argue quite the contrary.
You probably think that the legitimacy and authority of the
state, or government, is overwhelmingly a function of democracy,
Western-style.
But democracy is only one factor. Nor does democracy in itself guarantee legitimacy.
Think of Italy. It is always voting, but the
enduring problem of Italian governance is that its state lacks
legitimacy. Half the population don't really believe in it.
Now let me shock you: the Chinese state enjoys greater legitimacy than any Western state. How come?
In China's case the source of the state's legitimacy lies entirely outside the history or experience of Western societies.
In my first talk
I explained that China is not primarily a nation-state but a
civilisation-state. For the Chinese, what matters is civilisation. For
Westerners it is nation. The most important political value in China is
the integrity and unity of the civilisation-state.
Given the sheer size and diversity of the country, this is
hugely problematic. Between the 1840s and 1949, China was occupied by
the colonial powers, divided and fragmented. The Chinese refer to it as
their century of humiliation.
They see the state as the embodiment and guardian of Chinese
civilisation. Its most important responsibility - bar none - is
maintaining the unity of the country. A government that fails to ensure
this will fall.
There have been many examples in history. The legitimacy of
the Chinese state lies, above all, in its relationship with Chinese
civilisation.
But does the Chinese state, you may well ask, really enjoy legitimacy in the eyes of its people?