The writer is a poet and author based in Islamabad.
Straightforward
duplicity or covering up of facts to deny and reject what actually
happened does not change what actually happened.
Nor could moulding the
perceptions of a group of people who live under your influence change
what actually happened. But since the rest of the people in large
numbers who do not live under your influence will have a different set
of ideas to believe in and a different set of facts to draw upon for
information, a small set of people under your influence will be
continuously at odds with the rest of the world. Owing to the
advancement of a particular worldview over the years through school
curriculum, news media and the public messages sent out by the state
establishment, so many of us, the middleclass Pakistanis, are at odds
with the rest of the world.
We live in a perpetual state
of denial. Everything that does not fit our idea of the world is either
false propaganda or a malicious conspiracy hatched against our country
or our society. Individually, we suffer from paranoia, second-guessing
and distrust. Collectively, we seek solace in an imagined past, a sense
of possessing higher moral values and a hardened self-righteousness. Our
rejecting reality and clinging to preconceived notions limit the
possibility of our intellectual progress and economic growth. Our social
imagination is blurred by the clouds of self-deceit and nurtured
ignorance.
Let us begin from some major happenings in our
history. Many of us believe that it was only the Muslims of the
Subcontinent who were killed by Hindu bigots and Sikh zealots at the
time of Partition in 1947. What happened to the Hindus and Sikhs in
Muslim-majority areas? Human beings show the most atrocious side of
their character once violence is let loose, whatever faith they preach
or practise. Those who do not participate in riots, loot, plunder and
slaughter, provide legitimacy to them by either staying silent, looking
away or justifying these cruel acts by calling them a reaction to the
atrocities of the other side, self-defence or natural outburst of
emotions. It is not truth that is the first casualty in a war, it is
humanity. However, in order for a society to move forward truth must be
established before any reconciliation can take place.
Soon
after independence and the creation of Pakistan, weren’t the
governments and provincial assemblies of the-then NWFP and Sindh
undermined by the central government? Did we not annex Kalat state
expediently rather than through a process of negotiations? Didn’t
Liaquat Ali Khan, the first prime minister, get the Objectives
Resolution passed on the one hand and moved us into the American camp on
the other?
We are told that the self-proclaimed field
marshal, Ayub Khan, came to power when the country was going through
massive political instability and then brought about a revolution in our
economy. The hero was actually a usurper of power who abrogated the
1956 Constitution of the Republic. His lopsided policies and attitude
towards the eastern wing fundamentally caused the creation of Bangladesh
and the Islamic Republic of West Pakistan, in which we live. Social
justice was denied and civil rights were suspended in his time.
Political rallies were fired upon even in the early years, but Hasan
Nasir was the first major political prisoner who was tortured to death
by the state in Lahore Fort in 1960. I write these lines on the day of
his 52nd death anniversary. Few would know that there was little change
in Pakistan’s literacy rate over the glorious decade of Ayub Khan. Some
say it actually came down.
Fatima Jinnah rallied the
opposition against the martial-law ruler but was made to lose the
presidential elections. She later died in mysterious circumstances.
Neither has there been a proper inquiry conducted into the
Quaid-e-Azam’s ambulance running out of fuel on its way from Mauripur
airbase to Flagstaff House in Karachi, nor into Fatima Jinnah’s death.
Come
1971. We treated our fellow countrymen shabbily for too long and lost
them. We lost the war as well. I was told in my school by the Pakistan
Studies teacher that most of the teachers in East Pakistan were Hindu.
They poisoned the minds of students against Pakistan and helped create
Mukti Bahini. If some of us were not to read other accounts by
independent authors, had not become familiar with what was happening in
the power corridors, on assembly floors, within the close doors of
government and military offices and in the internal meetings of the
political parties of the time, if we had not visited Bangladesh, we
would still think that our teachers were right.
For the
last four decades, we have been finding ways to deny what actually
happened in East Pakistan. One of our preferred ways is to find a work
by a non-Pakistani, non-Muslim author to prove our point that it was not
entirely our fault. I am afraid it was. Does it really matter if Sheikh
Mujibur Rahman exaggerated the figure of casualties of Begalis in the
1971 military action and the resultant war? Does it really matter if
three million or three hundred thousand did not die, but only thirty
thousand? Is thirty thousand a small number by any means? Didn’t the
West Pakistanis insist on parity with East Pakistan despite its larger
population? Didn’t we ask for, and then obtain, a bigger share in
economic resources all along? Didn’t we look down upon our fellow
countrymen and -women with contempt? Did we not deny them the right to
rule after the Awami League won 160 out of 300 seats in the 1970
elections to the National Assembly, forming a simple majority? Could we
deny all this?
Let us now come to the present. So many of
us believe that 9/11 was actually a Jewish conspiracy. All Jews were
told in advance not to go to their offices in the World Trade Centre.
Some even say that Osama bin Laden was an American agent. Well, well,
Saudi Arabia is an unrelenting American ally in the world, and
particularly in the Middle East. Osama was a Saudi dissident. He wanted
to bring the kingdom down, didn’t he? How come some of our rightwing
opinion-makers support both Saudi Arabia and Osama at the same time?
Saudis did not accept his body for burial. Or was he really killed? My,
my! When the whole world asks what Osama was doing in Pakistan for so
many years while Pakistan itself is a part of the war waged against him
and his outfit, we are more concerned about how the American choppers
could enter our airspace and violate our sovereignty. From Liaquat Ali
Khan to Ayub Khan, from Ziaul Haq to Pervez Musharraf, all chose for us
to side with the Americans. All religious outfits were American allies
until the early 1990s. Could we deny all that?
When Malala
Yousafzai was shot, the Taliban accepted responsibility and provided a
rationale for their action, quoting religious texts. But a group came up
and said that the Taliban couldn’t have done that because it is against
their values. Rather than our supporting Malala’s cause with one voice,
a concerted campaign is launched against her, casting doubts upon the
incident, calling her family American agents. The denial of what
happened to Malala will lead to denial of education to our girls.
Obituary:
Rest in peace, Iqbal Haider. You would have called me from Karachi
after reading this piece. You will be missed dearly.
Email: harris.khalique@gmail.com